softare development

Why It’s Difficult to Debug Other People’s Code (And what Can be Done About it)

Debugging your own code is hard enough — debugging someone else’s code is a whole different level. It feels like stepping into a house where the light switches are mislabeled, the rooms are in odd places, and the instructions are written in a language you barely understand.

Start learning how to write computer programs

Below are the core reasons it’s so difficult, followed by practical strategies that actually work.

1. Different Thinking Patterns

Every developer has a unique mental model:

  • How they name variables
  • How they structure logic
  • Their level of abstraction
  • Their preference for libraries or patterns

You’re not just reading code — you’re decoding someone else’s brain.

2. Lack of Comments or Documentation

Many developers assume their logic is “self-explanatory.”
Spoiler: it rarely is.

Without:

  • Clear comments
  • Function explanations
  • API references
    … you waste hours reverse-engineering what a 5-line function was supposed to do.

3. Hidden Assumptions

Developers often build with assumptions like:

  • “This value will never be null.”
  • “This API call always returns quickly.”
  • “Users won’t input invalid data.”

When you don’t know these assumptions, the code behaves in surprising ways.

4. Unfamiliar Tech Stack or Coding Style

Maybe they used:

  • A framework you don’t know
  • A design pattern you don’t usually use
  • A naming style that makes your eye twitch

You waste time learning their tools before fixing the bug.

5. Poor Project Structure

Some codebases are a maze:

  • Circular file dependencies
  • Massive God classes
  • Random utility files
  • Functions that do 10 things instead of 1

You get lost before you even find the bug.

6. Side Effects Everywhere

Global state.
Mutating objects.
Functions that implicitly change things in other modules.

Debugging becomes a detective mission.

7. No Tests

Nothing sets you up for failure like:

  • No unit tests
  • No integration tests
  • No reproducible scenario

You’re flying blind.

What You Can Do About It (Actionable)

1. Start With the Expected Behavior

Before touching any code, answer:

  • What exactly is the bug?
  • What should be happening?
  • What are the inputs and outputs?

Clarity saves time.

2. Reproduce the Bug First

Make it fail consistently.
If it doesn’t fail reliably, you cannot fix it reliably.

3. Read the Code Like a Story

Don’t jump to fixing — understand flow:

  • Where does data enter?
  • What transformations occur?
  • What leaves the system?

Follow the trail.

4. Add Temporary Logs

Print statements are underrated:

console.log("Value at step 1:", x)
console.log("API response:", response)
console.log("Function reached")

Logs give visibility into a stranger’s logic.

5. Visualize the Flow

Use diagrams for:

  • Data flow
  • Component hierarchy
  • State transitions

You’ll understand faster.

6. Write Small Tests Around Problematic Areas

Even if the original dev didn’t write tests, you can:

  • Create a test for the bug
  • Use it to verify your fix
  • Ensure it doesn’t break later

7. Isolate the Bug

Don’t debug the whole forest — find the tree.

  • Comment out sections
  • Create minimal replicas
  • Trace the smallest failing path

8. Refactor Before Fixing (When Necessary)

Bad code becomes clearer with:

  • Better variable names
  • Extracted helper functions
  • Cleaner logic

Refactoring is sometimes the surest way to understand.

9. Ask Clarifying Questions

If the developer is available:

  • “Why was this function designed this way?”
  • “Is this code path still in use?”
  • “What assumptions does this rely on?”

A 30-second question can save hours.

10. Document Your Fix Thoroughly

Future developers will debug your code.
Leave a breadcrumb trail:

  • Comments
  • Commit messages
  • Notes on assumptions

You make life easier for the next person.

Final Thoughts

Debugging someone else’s code is hard because you are navigating:

  • A different mind
  • A different style
  • A different set of assumptions

But with a systematic approach — reproducing the bug, reading the flow, adding logs, testing, refactoring, and documenting — the impossible becomes manageable.

Share
Published by
codeflare

Recent Posts

The Golden Ratio (φ)

1. What Is the Golden Ratio? The Golden Ratio, represented by the Greek letter φ (phi), is…

11 hours ago

CSS Combinators

In CSS, combinators define relationships between selectors. Instead of selecting elements individually, combinators allow you to target elements based…

3 days ago

Boolean Algebra

Below is a comprehensive, beginner-friendly, yet deeply detailed guide to Boolean Algebra, complete with definitions, laws,…

4 days ago

Complete Git Commands

Git is a free, open-source distributed version control system created by Linus Torvalds.It helps developers: Learn how to…

1 week ago

Bubble Sort Algorithm

Bubble Sort is one of the simplest sorting algorithms in computer science. Although it’s not…

1 week ago

Impostor Syndrome for Software Developers

In the world of software development—where new frameworks appear overnight, job titles evolve every three…

1 week ago